Pages Navigation Menu

HSMWorks acquired by Autodesk

4 Flares Filament.io 4 Flares ×

Autodesk HSMWorksOn October 1, 2012, Autodesk Inc. announced that it had acquired “certain assets of HSMWorks ApS”.  For those of you who might not know, HSMWorks is a company based in Denmark that develops a CAM product that runs inside SolidWorks.  What is Aps you might wonder as I did.  Wikipedia describes this as an abbreviation for “Anpartsselskab”, which means limited liability company in Danish.  But there are more important questions that need to be answered.

First question that comes to my mind is why in the world are the HSMWorks founders selling out?  The conventional wisdom seems to be that the founders of HSMWorks are cashing out after Autodesk came in with an offer they could not refuse.  But I would beg to differ on this opinion.  CAM industry insiders will remember the HSMWorks a year ago in SolidWorks world 2011, made a big splash and offered a free 2-1/2 axis program.  They gave away a whopping 1/3 of their entire portfolio.  And HSMWorks ain’t Autodesk.  It is a small company trying to keep the lights on.  A year later they sell out.  Connect the dots and I am almost certain that this was a fire sale.  In my opinion, HSMWorks initiated this acquisition conversation because they were in financial trouble or the founders were just tired of not gaining any traction in the marketplace.  I cannot but compare this with what happened with Alibre Inc. just two years ago.  After announcing a $99 price for their Alibre Design product in 2010, they ended up selling out to 3D Systems in 2011.  The parallels here are way too many to not draw the same conclusions.

Now why is Autodesk buying a company that makes a fully integrated plug-in for a competitor’s product? My thoughts on this are as follows:

  • Both Dassault Systems and Siemens have enterprise level product offerings as well as a mid-range product offerings in the MCAD space.  In the case of Dassault Systems, it is Catia & SolidWorks while in the case of Siemens it is the NX & SolidEdge.  Both of these companies also have full blown PLM offerings as well.  Autodesk recently announced a PLM product after arguing for a long time that PLM was not necessary for their customers. Now with the acquisition of a CAM company, they are trying to walk up the value chain and be considered as one of the big boys.
  • Autodesk has $2.5 billion in the bank.  With so much money not earning much in terms of interest the executives at Autodesk must be itching to pull the trigger on “strategic acquisitions”.  Corporate speak for “let us throw some darts on the wall and see what sticks.”  Watch for more such acquisitions in the near future.  Whether these acquisitions make sense or not might not be the right question to ask.

Now here is my take on the winners and losers in this event.

HSMWorks:  Winners. The founders who were written checks by Autodesk and the employees who were absorbed into Autodesk are for sure the biggest winners here.  They now have a company with very deep pockets who can bankroll their development.

Autodesk: Only time will tell.  History has proven repeatedly that a large company taking over a small company and screwing the integration up is quite common place.  Case in point: Autodesk buying a CAM company called MES in the 1980s for their CAM technology and ending up doing nothing noteworthy with the CAM technology.  But in the grand scheme of things, even if they fail it might just not matter since they have such deep pockets.

Autodesk CAM Partner Program: Loser.  Autodesk tried for many years to create a partner program like the one SolidWorks has created but failed miserably.  They have made a decision that owning CAM technology is strategically important – more important than maintaining a stance of neutrality that is absolutely necessary when trying to build a partner program.  I would not want to be on the product program team at Autodesk right now.

Autodesk CAM Partners:  Losers.  Having spent resources building a product for Inventor they now have an in-house product to compete with.  They can’t be happy about this situation.

SolidWorks:  A little poke in the eye but they have 6 other Gold partner CAM products they probably don’t care much.

HSMWorks Customers:  Losers.  After investing time and money in a product that is critical to their business they find out that the product is most probably a dead product.  The SolidWorks product will atrophy slowly but it is dead as a door knob.  Sorry folks.  They just have to start looking for alternative products.  Maybe not an immediate priority but they eventually have to do it.  Don’t believe me?  Talk to SolidWorks and Rhino customers who were using the T-Splines plug-ins.  Similar story and you can see how that ended up.

HSMWorks Resellers:  The biggest losers.  My heart goes out to these folks. Some of them probably built their business around the HSM product and now their contracts would have been terminated.  The bigger ones with multiple products in their portfolio will suck it up and move on.  The smaller guys will be scrambling to look for alternative products to sell or even alternative businesses to start.  Not a pretty picture whichever way you look at it.

VisualCAM

 

Joe Anand has been President & CEO of MecSoft Corporation since 1997. Previously Joe worked for Siemens UGS PLM Software running a group implementing special projects for strategic partners such as GM, Opel and GE as well as working on 3D machining algorithms for the NX product. Before that he worked at Intergraph Corp. and was in-charge of Intergraph’s 3 Axis milling product. Joe also held senior positions at Auto-trol Tech. and GE Calma. Joe has a MS degree, in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University with a research emphasis on robot and motion simulation.

4 Flares Facebook 4 Twitter 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0 Pin It Share 0 Filament.io 4 Flares ×

8 Comments

  1. Nice article Joe. It’s good to read about this. Thanks for sharing.

    • You’re welcome, Rene & thank you for reading.

  2. Very interesting take on the Autodesk buyout of HSMWorks.
    It’s hard to argue with anything you posted Joe.

    What is your take on what this means for the CAM industry in general?
    From where I sit, it only hurts the CAM market as a whole as it reinforces
    the generally poor perception that customers have of their CAM suppliers and resellers.

    It looks like there is more of this kind of consolidation coming with to a CAM market that is already saturated with mid to high end solutions.

    • Tim,

      Thanks for the response. As far as my take on what this means for the CAM industry in general, I am not sure if this acquisition changes much. I believe the reason CAM has not gone through consolidation until now is not because of lack of attempts. You may remember a few years ago Delcam bought EGS (makers of FeatureCAM) and Cimatron bought Gibbs. A lot of observers at that time thought that this was the beginning of a consolidation in the CAM business. Did not happen then and I don’t think it is going to happen now. After all HSMWorks was just a small fish (I don’t mean this pejoratively) in a big pond. The worldwide CAM market size is estimated to be around $1.7 billion and in my estimation HSMWorks was probably had a 0.2-0.3% share of this market. Is Dassault going to react and jump into the action? Is Siemens going to follow? I don’t think so but even if they do, this might change things but not by much. Note that Dassault and Siemens already have in-house CAM products.

  3. Joe, great to have the insight from an insider of the CAM industry. What bothers me is why would Autodesk even be tempted by a struggling CAM vendor. With $25M in the bank, why not buy a market leader and get an immediate customer base? Of course, I freely admit to not being able to predict Autodesk moves. This is just another one.

    • Roopinder,

      You probably know much more about the “mind” of Autodesk than I do. All I am doing here is connecting the dots as I see fit as an outside observer.

  4. “Talk to SolidWorks and Rhino customers who were using the T-Splines plug-ins. Similar story and you can see how that ended up.”

    As far as I can tell, the acquisition of T-splines by Autodesk did not have the negative results that a lot of people expected. It’s still being developed, and just yesterday in fact, they announced a new version for Rhino.

    I’m not sure how the Solidworks version (tsElements) is faring. I haven’t been paying much attention to that plug-in.

    Dan

    • Dan,

      Glad to hear that your experience with T-splines for Rhino has not been impacted. I hear a different story from our mutual customers however. In any event the comparison with the SolidWork’s product might be more relevant in this case.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. The Future of Autodesk in the CAD/CAM Industry | MecSoft The Blog | CAD/CAM Software Industry Tips - […] when I thought the dust is beginning to settle after my last blog article about Autodesk, things are beginning…

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

4 Flares Facebook 4 Twitter 0 Google+ 0 LinkedIn 0 Pin It Share 0 Filament.io 4 Flares ×